the burdens of representation, part 5643
I’ve been meaning to post about Max, the ftm character on the new season of the L Word, and the burdens of trans representation. The L Word already has a considerable burden of representation — it’s about dykes, and their friends and their ‘communities’, and while the first season channelled viewers into the characters’ dramas through an outsider’s (straight, male) gaze, threatened but also titillated, subsequent seasons have abandoned that tack and inserted more and more queer in-jokes. The hair has gotten shorter, the clothes have gotten less girly and more dykey… The only thing that hasn’t changed is, everyone is still rich. Pretty much. But the producers are now obviously communicating with and fed by the desires of their queer viewers.
Enter Max, once Moira, a working-class trannyboy from the mid-West who doesn’t know how to eat lobster and never gets introduced to anyone by his stupid girlfriend, Jenny. He begins to take T (which he gets without a doctor’s prescription, mysteriously) and talks to surgeons about having chest surgery (the surgeon actually suggests he hold a benefit to pay for surgery. Has anyone ever experienced that?) He also develops a raging temper and becomes more possessive of his girl — no-one else can even dance with Jenny, let alone make a pass at her. Meanwhile, he cheats on her with gay men, because somehow, fucking a guy makes him feel more like a guy. (It’s obviously a guy thing.)
Now there’s a petition to sign, attesting that L Word is transphobic, and people are mad.
(From the petition, via Transcending Gender:
Many of the aspects of Max’s character arc are based on the stereotype that transmen are driven by and use testosterone as an excuse to become abusive, violent, and over-sexualized. We believe that this is inherently transphobic, inaccurate and exaggerates most transmasculine experiences of testosterone. This also dangerously implies that people who physically transition cannot control of their actions under the influence of hormones.
Further, much of Max’s physical transition is inaccurate and very misleading. Max’s transition is sped up to cover several years of physical changes in a few months which extensively inflates a person’s physical transition. Max uses street hormones without the supervision of a doctor, a *highly* dangerous practice, the risks of which are not acknowledged on the show. Lack of access to trans-sensitive medical care is a huge issue for people of trans experience and it often takes years to even be able to access hormones and surgery, (which does not even include the financial barriers that are mentioned in the plot.)
Some of this is true: Max’s facial hair grows in wayyy too fast, and he sports a moustache supposedly a month after starting T. (No-one has ever grown a moustache that fast, not even hairy folks.) And yet, I don’t like the politics of representation at work here. A primetime television show — even one about queers — is not a viable political space for the ‘authentic’ representation of transpeople. Secondly, I guess I’d like to respond in a more complex, subjective way. Personally, I want the character to be perfectly identifiable — a good ‘fantasy’ FTM, like the lesbians on the show are good fantasy lesbians with their swimming-pools and their seeming ability to get laid anytime, anywhere. An FTM I can watch with pride. So it’s not so much the ‘inauthenticity’ of the character that is the problem, but that the character represents the wrong kind of inauthenticity — an undesirable one.
Perhaps for that very reason, I find most of Max’s screentime embarrassing and weird. I was also a moody, intemperate T newbie three years ago. I’ve sat with other trannyboys who talked about how screwed up “women” are, and I probably didn’t say, “This is bullshit,” like I oughta have. I know many transmen who have worse gender and sexual politics than most nontrans men. Taking T doesn’t do that to you. T can unbalance something, for a while, and make visible stuff that was present already, but the act of becoming male doesn’t make that happen. It seems easy to read Max’s character arc that way; the other characters certainly do.
So I’m conflicted. It’s not enough for me to say, “This is transphobic.” It’s discomforting and possibly dodgy, but what primetime television show ain’t? Partly, I admire the writers for having the courage not to write a character who is totally sympathetic. The other characters are equally fucked up at times (in fact, I can’t think of another character who hasn’t behaved very badly at some point across the series.)
It remains to be seen whether Max’s roid rage will settle, and whether he’ll ‘learn something’ from his experience (like all good minority members in television shows) or personify that old dyke community fear about ftm’s — that not only will all the good butches turn into men, but they’ll also turn gay to boot. Maybe, once his ‘trans’ arc finishes, he can become a part of the architecture of the show, just another character, interacting and having dramas like the rest. Stay tuned.

Awesome post! I quit watching the program a couple of weeks ago, for reasons unrelated to Max, but the protrayal of Max has bothered me for the past couple of weeks. It will be interesting to see how/if he comes around. Post once in a while and let us know, would you please? :)
Comment by Denise — March 20, 2006 @ 4:07 pm
I’d feel more in line with the not-all-saints portrayal defense if transpeople on teevee weren’t generally portrayed as fucked up, evil, or both.
Comment by piny — March 20, 2006 @ 8:59 pm
but they’ll also turn gay to boot.
Also, I’m glad I’m not the only one who’s noticed that aspect of the stereotype.
Comment by piny — March 20, 2006 @ 11:09 pm
I’d feel more in line with the not-all-saints portrayal defense if transpeople on teevee weren’t generally portrayed as fucked up, evil, or both.
Well, yeah. Or just kinda crazy and screwed up.
Comment by Az — March 20, 2006 @ 11:52 pm
The L Stands For
Context matters in art. Really. Ilene Chaiken, executive producer of the L-Word, apparently missed that memo. Writes nubian at blac(k) academic:fuck you ilene chaiken. fuck you for having the audacity to have a black woman used …
Trackback by jay sennett jaywalks — March 21, 2006 @ 6:45 pm
hi Az,
I hope you’ll pardon an across the board ignorant question (I’ve not seen the L-Word, I only know about trans theory and politics and all from your blog, etc) …
“He also develops a raging temper and becomes more possessive of his girl — no-one else can even dance with Jenny, let alone make a pass at her.”
Is this an experience with any connection to reality, or just a pure fiction? I’m really curious. I went through my own conversion to being really jealous and possessive a few years ago, not due to any ingested substances. It’s not at all something I’m comfortable with but I really can’t help it (I can, of course, help how I act and I also avoid situations where it will come up, though not when friends deliberately wind me up about it). And as much as I’m not all okay w/ it, the time I spent admitting I didn’t feel that way was even worse.
take care,
Nate
Comment by Nate — March 26, 2006 @ 9:38 am
Hey Nate,
Well, in my experience jealousy is about all kinds of contextual stuff — the situation, the people, the issues or particular ‘neuroses’ (to be unwillingly Freudian) at stake — rather than gender. Jealousy is not a natural ‘masculine’ attribute, and it doesn’t seem related to testosterone. To get more persona,l I’d have to email you — and I owe you an email, anyhow. More forthcoming.
Comment by Az — March 27, 2006 @ 11:41 am
hi Az,
I didn’t mean to suggest that jealousy wasn’t situational. I guess what I wanted to ask was… the depiction in the program sounds like it could be read two ways. One is a depicion of one person in one situation who gets jealous and who happens to be transitioning but the two are adjacent, not causally linked. Another read is a depiction of a person in a type of situation in which a certain jealousy is likely to occur, that is, a depiction of transitioning as a type of situation that provokes or is particularly susceptible jealousy. I took your post to be saying the show says the latter (if I got you wrong please correct me). My naive question (motivated in part by projecting my own insecurities) was, is this at all the case? I take your answer to mean, basically no. Is that right? Looking forward to that email.
take care,
Nate
Comment by Nate — March 29, 2006 @ 3:23 pm